Silicon tits, limp dicks and doing battle with the purple-helmeted warrior
Ever logged on to playboy.com? What about Penthouse? Or Hustler? I bet you’re busy tapping “Bianca’s Smut Shack” into Alta Vista now. Baywatch boobs, queens of the hand shandy and bimbos du jour attract literally thousands of home page hits every second. A little harmless titillation won’t make you go blind – depending on how many radons your monitor emits. As a wag I interviewed for this feature quipped: “What’s the best thing about using the Net for viewing porn? It’s easy to wipe the screen clean.” Boom, boom.
When it comes to perving, it’s the anonymity of logging on that lures so many diffident men. Before, the embarrassment of skulking into a local newsagent’s restrained adult entertainment sales. Now they can use the Internet to sign up subscribers and flaunt on-line erotica, publishers are in a state of orgasmic bliss.
And when it comes to Web page hits, forget every previous page counter you’ve seen. While many people proudly claim to have scored 10,000 monthly hits, porn sites have counters that feature seven-figure digits. Want a popular Web site? Start scanning in those kinky photos.
The UK’s adult entertainment publishers specialise in touting realistic pin-up women of all shapes and ages, with attention-grabbing cover lines, such as: “Get your gob on my gusset”, and “Suburban sex-pots strip”. Fiesta (http://www.fiesta.co.uk/), Britain’s largest adult publishing company, had 1.2 million hits in the first week it opened. “It was the busiest site in Europe, with 250,000 hits in one afternoon,” says Fiesta web site editor David Spencer.
This contrasts with the company’s leading magazine, Fiesta, which has a monthly circulation of 200,000 readers. Spencer says magazines will “always be around until the Net is fully developed.
“We’ll eventually get more advertising on the site and offer a subscription service.”
According to Spencer, British blokes prefer pictures of “real” women. “There’s a strong Carry On tradition here. They like women to look a bit earthier and enjoy a bit of a slapstick, humorous approach.” He describes the magazine’s readers as very demanding. “We get a lot of extremely specific letters. If you go wrong, they let you know. They’ll ask for things such as pictures of more women in tights, complain about the photo angles and whether the picture’s been cropped too tight. And those are just the nice letters.”
He says the company “hasn’t ruled anything out” in its plans for the site. “There could be a dating service and we’re thinking about using video. We’d like to have sound files so we can offer teasers for phone line ads. We’ve started selling pic packs from the magazines.” The site is intended to complement the magazines. “It’s an addition, and won’t surpass the publications.” He says some of the Net material is more explicit. “We can push the boundaries a little bit, but the pictures are similar to the ones we publish on paper. We have very good legal advisors. There are enough ground rules now to ensure any nasty stuff doesn’t get through.”
A year later, I contacted Spencer and the site hadn’t really changed. Plans for attracting advertising, a dating service, video and sound had all fallen through. “We need categorical proof the site could earn serious amounts of money before we devote more time to it,” Spencer says. “We’re deluged with email orders for sex and picture packs. It has raised awareness of our magazines across the globe and we’ve had loads of subscriptions from the US and Australia. We get many requests from Muslim countries, but we don’t send the magazines there because it’s illegal.” He points out that successful US sites, such as Penthouse, Playboy and Hustler, have all made most of their money from adverts. “UK companies are unwilling to associate themselves with adult mags – they’re very prudish and there’s a lot of stigma attached to it.” He claims the profitable sites are mainly based in Amsterdam or the US. These are often portrayed as amateur sites, but dishonestly lure the readers in with several teasing pages, then ask them to pay up. “We’re a professional organisation and we’re not going to try and entrap people and fleece them. We’re upfront about what we’re about.”
He says the site’s occasionally updated and this will be continued. “A lot of Net users want to see our material for free. But we’re not going to put in a lot of work when nobody’s paying. If we discovered we could charge, we’d offer additional services. The next magazine we’ll be putting online is Ravers, which features pregnant girls and shaving.”
As with many porn sites, as soon as they gain an iota of publicity, they’re swamped with users and have to be temporarily closed and moved to a larger server. This happened to the 130-page X-site, which was mentioned in The Guardian and consequently overloaded and put out of action for two weeks. The site showcases the home pages of Fantasy Publications magazines such as New Talent, Amateur Video, Real Wives, The Sex Report, Reader’s Wives, Eros Digest, Electric Blue and Big & Fat. “Each magazine has a gallery of 10 stills,” says X-site picture librarian Al Needham, who helped features writer Danny Clamp design the Web site. “We were all set for a quiet launch, then after The Guardian interview the system was choked.”
He says British men prefer the “girl next door/readers’ wives style” pictures. “It’s a niche market. Our readers prefer amateur girls and we rely heavily on plain M&S white knickers. We get about 30 photos sent in every week by men who want their wives to be seen by millions of people around the world.
“We’ve put a couple of photos on the Net that newsagents might not allow on the shelves. But we’re being cautious and will keep tabs on the situation. We’ve never used hard core material or photos with anal detail or gratuitously open `bat wing’ vaginal shots. In our Sex Report section we’re allowed to use educational shots of couples having sex, but these have to be tasteful.”
Needham says Fantasy Publications is “just testing the water” with the site and would like to evaluate the potential financial gains. “We’ve got a huge back catalogue of images and features used over the past 20 years. The early ‘70s photographs were a Martini-style product viewed by debonair people. Now attitudes have rapidly changed and with the laddish phenomenon we can be a bit more honest about it – just have a wank and that’s that.”
He says the overwhelming popularity of porn sites suggests that men feel inhibited about buying magazines in a newsagency. “When they have total freedom, the average guy will look at people having sex with badgers, just out of curiosity.”
Paul Raymond Publications (PRP) owns adult magazines such as Mayfair and Club. When the company went on-line, it racked up two million hits within a month. “We’re hoping to have a full on-line edition of Men Only up and running,” says publisher, Stephen Bleach. He says half of their hits are from the US, 25 per cent are from the UK and the rest are from around the world. About 90 per cent of users are male. “We don’t charge for the site, but we may consider a paying service in the future,” Bleach moots.
He claims some of the site’s photos are “a little bit raunchier” than those found in the magazines. “There’s no single regulating body on the Internet to tell you what to do. But we haven’t used anything that’s illegal.”
PRP is considering plans for an on-line dating service and introducing more interactivity to the site. “We see the Net as a medium for entertaining and stimulating people so they feel horny. We’re not going to ignore it.”
He thinks pornography “encourages individuals to use the Net”. “People won’t stop going online just because there’s something they don’t like on it. Parents still take their children to a cinema to see Disney films, even if the venue shows X-rated films too.”
The PRP site features warning signs and you have to type in “I am over 18” before viewing the pages. “We protect children from using the site as best we can. We don’t want them to look at it or to encourage people to illegally have sex. It’s only right when they’ve reached a certain level of maturity.”
Bleach says he prefers magazines, but “things are changing”. “In 10 to 15 years’ time, the Net is the best form of communication for democracy.”
As for teledildonics (virtual sex/remote control sex stimulators), he thinks the outlook is grim. “Men and women will always get turned on by words and images, but a virtual reality suit? I can’t see it. Making love to a piece of plastic is entirely different.”
Apart from the corporate sites, there are squillions of amateur efforts with favourite porn links. These usually shout, “WANTED! Nude pics of Nova High School Alumni!”, “Please cum again!” and proudly proclaim, “These pages are banned by Surfwatch”. I tracked down some of the oglers who select their fave piccies for your delectation.
The CyberGirls Link Page at http://www.cybercity.dk/users/ccc2394/ is authored by Mr CyberSex, who stresses that he doesn’t actually use pornographic sites. “I only collect links to other erotic sites, though sometimes I’ll check out Penthouse or Hustler. The CyberGirls site started as a bet to see who could get 10,000 hits first. I did! Then I started the CyberGirls Link page.” He spends three hours a week updating his Web site with links sent from around the world. “But I don’t look at those sorts of pictures myself,” he claims. “I look at my girlfriend or buy a mag instead. I buy about four mags a year. I don’t really have a preference for hard core over nudity, as I’m from Denmark and am used to seeing hard core pornography and nudity every day.”
Mr CyberSex has been in a relationship for seven years. “My girlfriend looks at the pictures too and it’s stimulating for our relationship.” He’d like to see more “live action” and is interested in teledildonics (virtual sex/remote control sex stimulators). “Why not have safe sex with somebody you don’t know – that’d be something new!”
Guy Cooper of Modern Rome (http://www.xroads.com/~priapus) says he only spends 15 minutes each week looking at adult sites. “I’m a techno-geek. I’ve been into BBSing for many years. I originally started my Web page with an entirely different focus. The Modern Rome aspect evolved from my belief that the world is doomed to destroy itself. I sometimes study ancient cultures and governments, especially pre-Christian, in pursuit of information to back my theories.
“One day, when I was at a friend’s house scanning in a bunch of girlie pictures, my friend commented on how interesting they were and he was like a fascinated young boy. I wondered what other people would think, so I created the Busty Babes page to display the older pictures I had lying around. There was such a high interest level, I decided to renew my pursuit of this type of material. Most of the Web surfing I do is associated with maintaining my page – I only check out other adult sites if they ask me for a link.”
Cooper has been married for six and a half years and doesn’t think that looking at porn has affected his relationship. “I enjoy a limited amount of hard-core, but greatly enjoy tastefully presented female nudity.
“Most of the Net porn comes from magazines. I buy about three mags a year from newsagents and subscribe to Playboy. Net porn hasn’t changed my magazine buying habits at all.”
As for virtual sex stimulators, Cooper says, “My immediate response is to laugh. I would be interested in finding out about the technology, but I would not be particularly interested in participating.”
Web page designer Bill Burkoth’s Favourite Pics site is at http://www.whitman.edu/~burkotwt/porn.html. “Porn on the Net is not about climaxing while looking at pictures. Many guys look at porn to simply admire the beauty portrayed in these photos,” Burkoth says. “They are not tools for masturbation, but a form of art. I know hard core porn could be an argument against this, but one way to explain its presence is that we’re naturally curious. It’s similar to when they used to have freak shows at circuses. People want to look at uncommon practices.”
He doesn’t ever buy porn mags and said he would be “curious” about teledildonics. He spends about an hour weekly looking at Net porn and uses these sites “just for general amusement.” “Like any college student, I explored the possibilities – naked women, beer, video games.”
““““““““““““““““““““““
Women searching for a well-hung online man for a rapacious erotic evening will discover this is extremely difficult to find. You can show pics of women with their legs asunder and various intimate areas boldly spotlighted, but a man with an erect penis? Forget it. It’s illegal to show pornographic material which includes full erections. Because they’re just too – what? Scintillating? Scary? Stiff? Fine, but it’s so dull looking at pictures of flaccid pretty boys who are posing mainly for a gay audience.
And what turns women on anyway? Sales of magazines touting relationship and sex advice are breathtaking, but you won’t find many pictures of naked hunks. While women complain about porn on the Net and newsagents’ top shelves targetting men, publishers are trying to pinpoint exactly what appeals to women. The obvious answer is romance. There’s abundant erotic fiction written by women on the Net, with explicit scenes involving “clitoral convergence”, “harmonic hosedowns” and a “swampy mingling of primal oozings”.
Zac Keir has a good idea of what women like – she has been involved in the adult publishing industry for the past six years and has written for Penthouse, For Women, Forum and Erotic Stories. Now she runs a BBS called The Pleasure Dome, which has about 7,000 subscribers and features pics, chat areas and an on-line sex shop. “There’s an area for women and we have some female users,” Keir says. “I don’t know how many, though, because everyone dials in using pseudonyms and nicknames, so about 30 per cent of our members have female names, but some of these are transvestites.”
She says there is too much pornographic material which is solely aimed at men. “I’d like to see more women involved in the area of explicit sex entertainment.
“The main problem we have to deal with is the `angle of the dangle,’ which makes it very difficult to produce material that turns women on.” And what exactly is the angle? “When I was editing Women on Top, we followed the Mull of Kintyre rule. You get a map of the UK, turn to Scotland and look at the upturned Mull of Kintyre. That’s the acceptable angle,” Keir giggles.
“Now, all women have to look at is a lot of porn with no triggers for them, apart from high heels and stockings. Women aren’t going to get really turned on by that.”
Keir says many people often overreact to the presence of adult material, because they assume it’s about “dreadful bestiality or torture”. “But that sort of thing is not commercial because most people aren’t turned on by it,” Keir points out. “The ultimate human fantasy is to be with an enthusiastic person who wants to do the same sexual activities as you. So if you want to get naked and be smothered in custard and jump out of a window, you want someone who’s happy to cover you with custard and catch you.”
Despite the lack of women’s erotica, Keir thinks some male-orientated material can be appealing. “I can still get my jollies from a pic or readers’ letters,” she reveals.
Renowned transgendered photographer Del LaGrace, who attracted controversy by growing a goatee and sideburns, has been shooting erotic material aimed at women for the past 20 years. “One of the major problems is that men still own and control the means of production,” he says. “What women have seen all of their lives has been men’s representations of pornography, so now they’re trying, hoping and wanting to do something different.”
He says people who produce erotica for women find it difficult to be successful because of financial constraints – “the present market is much smaller.” But he agrees with Keir that the most restrictive factor in attracting women’s attention is the law. “An erect dick is what potentially turns most women on, and it’s against the law to photograph this. No-one gets excited about a non-erect dick.
“Also, if women try to put themselves in the picture, as men do when they’re looking at erotica, they want to feel that the guy is hot for them. Men are allowed to freely look at pictures of women with their legs behind their ears and that’s fine. I believe women enjoy, or have the potential to enjoy, nude photographs as much as men do, but we have to overcome centuries of conditioning.”
Grace describes his photographic technique as collaborative. “I don’t take pictures of anything that’s outside of myself – there’s always some connection. I feel a personal empathy with them.” His latest photographic theme is a series of “hermaphrodyke” photographs which use Grace and his lover as the main subjects. “I’m attempting to create an alternative to the either/or aspect of gender and sexual identity,” Grace explains. “We believe in the infinite capacity of gender to mutate and transgress all numerical boundaries.”
The most popular erotic mainstream magazine is For Women, which boasts about 60,000 readers monthly and features full-frontal male nudity. This month’s issue has an A-Z of amazing sex and a probing article about “To bed or not to bed?” which asks about whether you should shag your boss, a priest or your tumble drier (“once you find the right cycle, it should be plain sailing”.) Editor Ruth Corbett has worked in the adult publishing industry for the past two years. “I think women probably like erotic fiction, features about sex and sexy pictures. There’s a large female market for fiction – women write a lot of good material and they read plenty of it too.”
Corbett describes the magazine’s reader profile as being incredibly diverse. “They range in age from 18 to 60. We’ve had grandmothers write in, who’ve found For Women in their granddaughter’s bedrooms, thought it was quite an eye-opener and said they enjoyed it.” According to Corbett, For Women doesn’t print any pornographic material. “To me, pornography is when someone is portrayed as a victim. We just have pics of nude men on location, such as at the beach.” There were four men with their kit off in the current edition, which showed them looking very Chippendale-ish in the usual locations, frolicking in the surf, lolling around in a farmyard barn, and under the shower.
Diva editor Frances Williams says most so-called lesbian erotica is photographed by men and aimed at men too. Diva is a lesbian and lifestyle magazine with articles such as “To lick or not to lick?”, “femmes on top” and “Camille Paglia – the itch to bitch”. “The pictures usually feature women wearing too much lippy and blue eyeliner, or variations on this theme,” Williams says. “They often have their tongues touching.” She feels there is “an element of snobbery” towards pornographic images. “Some of the pics can be very crass and focus too much on genitals,” Williams forewarns.
Television X claims it offers “top class erotic entertainment for you and the man in your life”. It’s a cable adult fantasy channel with 200,000 subscribers, which claims some of its programs are aimed at women and couples. But how much of the material actually appeals to women? The site (http://www.televisionx.co.uk/to.html) is plastered with pictures of unattired females. Executive officer of Television X, Paul Donnelley, says women would enjoy The Adventures of Superdick and Michael van Straten’s Sex Talk show. Mr Superdick “teaches the women of Britain what good sex is all about. We get an astronomical amount of letters from women who are dissatisfied with their sex lives,” Donnelley patiently explains, while coyly refusing to divulge any statistics. “Mr Superdick has sex with women whose boyfriends and husbands are crap lovers. Note, I said husbands and boyfriends,” he smirks, hinting at the nymphomaniacal nature of seemingly demure suburban homemakers. “It’s surprising, especially considering the British stiff-upper-lip tradition.”
Stiffness is a contractual obligation for Mr Superdick – he has to perform with whoever the TV producers select. Do any ugly women ever get a look in? Not really. “If someone’s 5ft 9in with measurements of 36-28-34, then that’s OK, but if they’re 40-40-40 then they wouldn’t be selected. It’s a public service to help the women of Britain.” Only the ones with the right body shapes, though. The television program is edited to a 30-minute format and has run every week since last June (with a two-week break). “I can put you on the waiting list,” Donnelley generously offers.
If those antics don’t tickle your fancy, Michael van Straten’s Sex Talk teaches you how to perform various sex acts. “Another program aimed at couples is Super Virility. It’s educational and features a different topic each week on how to improve your sex life,” Donnelley adds.
““““““““““
Jacking off
Whether you’re bashing the bishop, burping the worm, choking Kojak, or coming to grips with yourself, there are plenty of people online who prefer company, even when they’re “pumping the gas at the self-service island”. For those who enjoy sharing their one-man show with others, there are many Net sites offering real-time experiences and tips on how to enhance your solo efforts.
I consulted the experts – people who host masturbation pages. All of them are men and most were only identified by their initials, which shows that even among the liberated, there is still an element of taboo when speaking about this topic. I asked them several random, nosy questions and scrambled and digitised their answers so even their mothers wouldn’t recognise their own son’s syntax.
Mick, of the simply titled Masturbation Home Page (http://www.fcbn.com/micknasty/), says the Net is “like a really big pub. If you treat people kindly and with respect, you will become friends or lovers. Most of the gatherings that I’m familiar with take place in IRC channels. There are as many of those as there are types of people.
“I’ve had several on-line sexual encounters. It’s very easy for women or couples to find others in the CU-SeeMe channels on IRC, provided they have a camera. With CU, you can actually see who you’re talking to and watch them perform while you perform for them. No hiding behind fake descriptions or nicknames.
“Our usual concept of sex includes touching. Obviously this can’t happen. There isn’t much difference between online sex and phone sex though… except you don’t pay for online sex, usually, and you’re doing it with someone you’ve never met before.
“The advantages are total security and anonymity. A single girl can have sex online and never reveal who she really is. Nobody can stalk her unless she’s foolish enough to give out too much information. As for disadvantages, with the exception of the obvious `non-physical’ relationship, you never really *know* who you’re talking to and having online sex with. A 25-year-old guy may be getting into a thing with a 22-year-old girl… except the girl is really a 65-year-old man. Kinda nasty when you actually find out that you’re not talking to who you thought.
“Some masturbation parties are wildly successful, like the one put on by New York Jacks, and some are total busts. I’m sure the success has much to do with the mix of participants. Women feel threatened in this type of environment, so they aren’t too quick to respond and actually show up. There’s an organisation in Florida called Club Relate – they’re a swinger type club that’s oriented towards masturbation.
“I can’t tell you how many times I’ve seen friends cheat on their spouses with people they’d met online. As for the concept of cheating, if your spouse caught you and was hurt by it, then yes, it’s cheating. But if both parties look at it as harmless fun, then no, it’s not.”
Harold Litten, author of The Joy of Solo Sex (http://www.solosex.com/), says online sex is ” masturbation, exhibitionism and voyeurism across a gulf”. “It reminds me of something that happened when I was staying at the West Side YMCA in New York City one night. I was in a horny, exhibitionistic mood. It was about 1:30am, and I turned a lamp on right next to a window, threw open the window and stood there in the light. In just a few seconds, across the courtyard of the U-shaped building, another light went on, and another. Two men stood at their windows nude, masturbating while watching me. It was an enormously thrilling experience being both voyeur and exhibitionist, yet knowing that the gulf between us `protected’ us from having to talk, get personally involved, risk disease, and all the other baggage that accompanies the act of sex. When we were finished, the lights were turned off, and we never met again. The thought that I could have been arrested for that sort of thing never occurred to me in that moment of utter passion, you know. I never would have recognised these guys up close, so I’ve never knowingly bumped into them again. I think that’s what online sex is all about.”
J of Wank Central (http://www.paranoia.com/~macb3th/nycu/) told me about his favourite sexual scenario. “What gets me really aroused is the thought of cumming in someone, sans condom. I’m conscious of the risks, so it’s a rare pleasure these days. On IRC it’s perfectly safe though, and it feels really good to let go. Also, the thought that the person on the other end is masturbating while thinking of you is arousing enough to put anyone over the edge.
“I don’t mind if someone says they’re a 22-year-old woman and they turn out to be a 98-year-old bloke. There is no difference. However, I personally like my relationships to be quite intimate, and at least include chatting on the phone together. I’ve had some surprises before, but all good ones. For instance when I was 14, I met the first person offline that I knew online. Well, she was 21. And I was 14. We had sex anyway.
“I’ve met a few people on IRC and have had many online sexual encounters. And three of these have spilled over into real-life sex. We all know how awkward it is to go out with a person for the first time – just imagine what it’s like when you’ve been trading graphic sexual fantasies for a few months!
“I didn’t really take any precautions before meeting them. I’m a big, rather strong guy, so I wasn’t too worried. I hadn’t seen them before because I’ve never done CU-SeeMe sex, even though I have a fast modem and a digital camera, but for some reason, I don’t like the thought of it.
“It’s awkward when you first meet them and you’re not sure how they feel. In most cases both parties want to get it on as soon as possible, but you can’t really say that. So it continues as first dates usually do, until someone makes a move and it goes EXTREMELY quickly from there.
“Anybody who’s tried on-line and physical sex will prefer real-life sex, just for the physical and emotional intimacy. A disadvantage of netsex is getting ‘desynched’… an example of this is when a person does something to you that would require you to be sitting down, but by the time that message reaches you you’ve already sent them a message indicating you’re standing up. It can be quite annoying and interrupt the fantasy.
” A lot of people worry about “what if it’s some 13 year old?”… well it happens. Most countries only state you have to take reasonable measures to find out the other person’s age, but all the proof you have on the net is what they tell you. The best thing about the Net can be the writing prowess of your `partner’. It can sometimes be good enough that it’s emotionally more exciting than real sex.
“I don’t wanna tell you where my fave sex channels are, or they’ll acquire a reputation and be overrun with ‘wannafucks’. If you go into #sex on IRC and state that you’re female, a wannafuck is a person who immediately asks: `Hey baby wanna have some hot sex?’ or any such thing. Basically, it’s a person who’s under the impression that he’s god’s gift to women and therefore can have anyone he wants at any time. They really irritate me.”
I found C.E. through an ad for a masturbation party. Did it go off with a bang? “So far I’ve received about 45 replies to my invitation, but unfortunately all have been from males. Some have indicated that they’d be interested in an all-male event, but most would prefer a co-ed group. I did have one all-male party, but at the last minute everyone but one guy cancelled, and the guy who did show up was spooky. He wanted to fondle me more than he wanted to masturbate, and that was kind of creepy. With the lack of female response, I’ve organised no other parties, and can’t decide if I’ll have any more all male events.
“Otherwise, I occasionally visit Bianca’s Smut Shack, for both erotic text and pic links posted by other visitors. I also check in at MickNasty’s page every once in a while for erotic text. I’m pretty convinced most of the text at both sites is hogwash, but some is very “helpful”. I don’t have on-line sexual encounters – just jackin’ off.
I managed to find dozens of emails soliciting for Jack and Jill parties where everyone gets together for a big wank-fest. This invite will give you a general idea of what’s expected:
“Would you like to attend a Jack and Jill party? So far we have nine people (6 guys and 3 girls). We’d like to triple that! It would be terrific if a group of men and women could get together on a regular basis for mutual masturbation sessions. Hell, we eat together, ski together, rollerblade together, why not masturbate together? It will most likely be held in a motel room with three-hour rates. Let’s try to keep the age group over 21 and under 40. We have some excellent ideas on how a really exciting, mutually satisfying time might be had by all. There will be `Lights Out’ fun sessions in the dark with absolutely no contact and `Blindfold’ meetings with light, gentle touching permitted. We will of course have a strict set of rules: everyone is nice to everyone and must respect each others’ wishes. No mouth to body contact below the waist. No insertion of anything anywhere. Interests will include solo, mutual, watching, being watched, and toys (no sharing).”
For those of you who’ve never indulged in online sex, I’ll include an excerpt from an encounter I found:
<voyeur> what’s the first thing you wash?
<waterbabe>I start by slowly wetting my *entire* body with warm water… then I work a rich lather into my soft stomach and hips…
<voyeur> I think I’m gonna like this story waterbabe, do go on 
<waterbabe> i work my way down my legs, massaging every inch until I get to my toes and then work my way back up….
past my thighs…
hips…
stomach…
when I reach my breasts, I very gently start to caress the undersides, where I am most sensitive…
<voyeur> I’m looking at your stomach now, and wishing I could move your hands. ok, I’ll be the first to admit it, yes I’m hard again. but how can I help it, such lovely breasts waterbabe
<waterbabe> I work the slippery soap around and around my breasts…. i just love it when my nipples get hard!
<voyeur> I do hope they are now
<waterbabe> i firmly massage my shoulders and neck….
ahhh… the tension melts away…
I turn my front to the spray….
<voyeur> feeling the warmth of the water as it cascades down your body
<waterbabe> letting the hard streams hit my nipples full on…
<voyeur> the water gently dripping off each nipple as is runs lower down your body where it falls in a stream to the floor. the steam building up as your fingers get closer…
<waterbabe> my hair has gotten wet from all the water splash, so I lather it up and let the suds run down my body, trickling into the cleave on my backside…
<voyeur> cleavage, I love cleavage
<waterbabe> I need to get *thoroughly* clean, so I take my well-formed bar of soap and work it down my stomach to my thighs again… I move it back and forth… mmmmm… the water beats against my shoulders… ooooohhhhhhh…
the lather is working up and the soap is only getting in my way…
so I set it aside and work with my hands….
the sensation grows warmer and warmer….
I turn again to face the spray and sit on the shower ledge.
The water beats… wetter and wetter…
It feels ssssoooo good!
Finally, I can’t stand it anymore…
it feels so good and my climax washes over me with the spray of the shower….
wave after wave…. after wave….
mmmmmmmm…………..
<voyeur> and people at work wonder why I’m always so chipper in the morning! And on that wonderful note, I’m gonna have to say goodnight waterbabe, and thank you.
===============
.net gets down and dirty
Let’s see how easy it is to initiate an “encounter”. I used my AOL account to see if I could find any sex on-line at the Love Shack. <aylward> asks if there are any females in the room.
<me> Yes! I’m female!
A private room is immediately opened by <aylward>. It’s just me and him.
<aylward> Hi!
<me> Hi. What usually happens here?
<aylward> Talk.
<me> Is there lots of raucous, dirty sex talk?
<aylward> Why? Do you like to talk dirty?
<me> Not really – I’m just looking for some. Why are you on-line today?
<aylward> Cos I’m using the school’s free account – might as well get the most out of it. It’s their money!
<me> Uni or high school?
<aylward> High school.
<me> Well, I certainly won’t be talking dirty with you! Are you using the Net during your lunchbreak? (it was 12.57pm)
<aylward> yeah.
Was he a 15-year-old schoolboy? Or an octogenarian? We’ll never know. But luckily I wasn’t arrested for trying to solicit a minor on-line.
